Article Sidebar

Submitted
November 20, 2024
Accepted
April 3, 2025
Published
May 12, 2025
Download
Download PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 140

Main Article Content

Abstract

This qualitative study examines how students use AI tools for their research and thesis writing, anchored in Constructivist Learning Theory, which holds that learners actively construct knowledge through experience and reflection. Utilizing the 4D model of appreciative inquiry, this study investigated the positive experiences of students using AI chatbots to write their theses, their ideal role in AI, methods to optimize the positive effects of AI chatbots, and approaches to promote a culture that accepts AI technology in research while upholding academic integrity. Using semi-structured interviews and focused group discussions with undergraduate students currently writing theses. The results indicated that students appreciated the productivity and efficiency increases made possible by AI tools such as instantaneous writing feedback and quick literary summarization. However, they were also worried about their potential effects on creativity and critical thinking. This study offers insightful information for academic institutions, faculty, and students. It suggests establishing clear rules and placing faculty training programs to guarantee the ethical and appropriate use of AI technologies in academic endeavors.

Keywords

AI tools student research appreciative inquiry academic integrity

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Dan Namanya, Mennen Pearl C. Talibong

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Author Biographies

Dan Namanya, Adventist University of the Philippines

Dr. Dan Namanya is a faculty member at the College of Theology, Adventist University of the Philippines (AUP). He holds a Doctor of Ministry from the Adventist International Institute of Advanced Studies (AIIAS). His extensive experience includes roles as a missionary, educator, pastor, and TV evangelist. His research interests encompass mission strategies, church ministry, and Christ-centered preaching, with presentations at various academic conferences. He has authored two books: "Christ: The Heart of Preaching" and "Locked Down with God." He is married to Sheri Joy Namanya, and they have two children, Danielle Witness and Mishael Victor.

Mennen Pearl C. Talibong, Mountain View College, Philippines

Dr. Mennen Pearl Caballero-Talibong is a professor at the School of Education, Mountain View College, and the head of the Master of Arts in English program. She holds a bachelor's degree in secondary education with a major in English from Mountain View College, a master's degree in language education from Central Mindanao University, and a doctorate in English with a specialization in TESOL from Silliman University. She previously served as an editor for Safeliz Editorial for seven years. Her research interests include language acquisition, English pedagogy, TESOL methodologies, and curriculum development in language education.

How to Cite
Namanya, D., & Talibong, M. P. C. (2025). Harnessing the Potential of AI Tools for Student Thesis Research and Writing: An Appreciative Inquiry. Pan-African Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 6(1), 30–48. https://doi.org/10.56893/pajes2025v06i01.03
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Abbas, N., Imran, A., Manzoor, R., Hussain, T., & Hussain, M. H. A. I. (2023). Role of artificial intelligence tools in enhancing students' educational performance at higher levels. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning, 35, 36-49. https://doi.org/10.55529/jaimlnn.35.36.49
  2. Abe, M. (2024). Transformative impact of AI on higher education. International Journal of Educational Research, 75(2), 100–112.
  3. Abedin, B., Meske, C., Junglas, I., Rabhi, F., & Motahari-Nezhad, H. R. (2022). Designing and managing human-AI interactions. Information Systems Frontiers.
  4. Aljuaid, M. (2024). The balanced approach to education: Integrating AI support with core academic writing education. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 27(1), 45–56.
  5. American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). https://doi.org/10.1037/0000165-000
  6. Aydin, M., & Karaarslan, A. (2023). The effects of over-reliance on AI dialogue systems on students' cognitive abilities: A systematic review. Smart Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40561-024-00316-7
  7. Bada, S. O., & Olusegun, S. (2015). Constructivism learning theory: A paradigm for teaching and learning. Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSR-JRME), 5(6), 66-70. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-05616670
  8. BaHammam, A. S., Trabelsi, K., Pandi-Perumal, S. R., & Jahrami, H. (2023, January 1). Adapting to the impact of AI in scientific writing: Balancing benefits and drawbacks while developing policies and regulations. Cornell University. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2306.
  9. Balta, N. (2023, June 15). Embracing the future: AI's AIai’s transformative potential in educational research. European Educational Researcher, 6(2), 1-2. https://doi.org/10.31757/euer.624
  10. Bozkurt, A. (2023). Tell me your prompts and I will make them true. Open Praxis, 16(2), 661-674. https://doi.org/10.55982/openpraxis.16.2.661
  11. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  12. Carobene, A., Padoan, A., Cabitza, F., Banfi, G., & Plebani, M. (2023, November 30). Rising adoption of artificial intelligence in scientific publishing: evaluating the role, risks, and ethical implications in paper drafting and review process. De Gruyter, 62(5), 835-843. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2023-1136
  13. Cheligeer, A., Osadchiy, V., & Lennon, M. (2023). Artificial intelligence augmented qualitative analysis: A case study in health research. PMC, 11103925. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40561-024-00316-7
  14. Chen, B. (2023). Unleashing the potential of prompt engineering in large language models: A comprehensive review. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2310.14735
  15. Christou, P. (2023). How to use artificial intelligence (AI) as a resource, methodological and analysis tool in qualitative research? The Qualitative Report, 28(7), 1968-1980. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2023.6406
  16. Christou, P. A. (2024). Thematic analysis through artificial intelligence (AI). The Qualitative Report, 29(2), 560-576. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2024.7046
  17. Cooperrider, D. & Whitney, D. (2005). A Positive Revolution in Change: Appreciative Inquiry. The change handbook: The definitive resource on today's best methods for engaging whole systems. 87.
  18. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Sage.
  19. Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2023, April 24). Artificial intelligence in higher education: the state of the field. Springer Nature, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00392-8
  20. Dave, M., & Patel, N. (2023, May 26). Artificial intelligence in healthcare and education. Springer Nature, 234(10), 761-764. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-023-5845-2
  21. Dong, Y. (2023, April 24). Revolutionizing Academic English Writing through AI-Powered Pedagogy: Practical Exploration of Teaching Process and Assessment. Journal of Higher Education Research, 4(2), 52-52. https://doi.org/10.32629/jher.v4i2.1188
  22. Edufever. (2024). A student's student’s guide to enhancing thesis writing with artificial intelligence. https://www.edufever.com/a-students-guide-to-enhancing-thesis-writing-with-artificial-intelligence/
  23. Fontenelle-Tereshchuk, D. (2024). Academic writing and ChatGPT: Students transitioning into college in the shadow of the COVID-19 pandemic. Discover Education, 3 (6). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-023-00076-5
  24. Garrel, J. V., & Mayer, J. (2023, November 9). Artificial intelligence in studies—use of ChatGPT and AI-based tools among students in Germany. Palgrave Macmillan, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02304-7
  25. Ghimire, S. (2024). AI in higher education: Improving student engagement and automating administrative tasks. Educational Technology Research and Development, 72(4), 330–345.
  26. Guingrich, R. E., & Graziano, M. S. A. (2024). Ascribing consciousness to artificial intelligence: human-AI interaction and its carry-over effects on human-human interaction. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1322781. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1322781
  27. Hein, G. E. (1991, October). Constructivist learning theory: The museum and the needs of people. Institute for Inquiry. [Conference presentation]. CECA (International Committee of Museum Educators) Conference, Jerusalem, Israel.
  28. Idroes, G. M., Noviandy, T. R., Maulana, A., Irvanizam, I., Jalil, Z., Lensoni, L., Lala, A., Abas, A. H., Tallei, T. E., & Idroes, R. (2023, July 24). Student perspectives on the role of artificial intelligence in education: A survey-based analysis. Journal of Educational Management and Leadership, 1(1), 8-15. https://doi.org/10.60084/jeml.v1i1.58.
  29. Klenk, M., & Hohmann, C. (2022). The dark side of artificial intelligence: Manipulation of human behaviour. Bruegel Blog. Retrieved from https://www.bruegel.org/blog-post/dark-side-artificial-intelligence-manipulation-human-behaviour
  30. Liang, Y. (2023, August 22). Balancing: The Effects of AI Tools in Educational Context. Frontiers in Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(8), 7-10. https://doi.org/10.54691/fhss.v3i8.5531
  31. Lin, Z. (2024, March 18). Techniques for supercharging academic writing with generative AI. Nature Biomedical EngineeringPortfolio. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-024-01185-8
  32. Obrenovic, B., Gu, X., Wang, G., Godinic, D., & Jakhongirov, I. (2024). Generative AI and human–robot interaction: Implications and future agenda for business, society, and ethics. AI & Society. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-024-01889-0 Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). Sage.
  33. Perkins, M., Roe, J., Postma, D., McGaughran, J., & Hickerson, D. (2023, January 1). Game of Tones: Faculty detection of GPT-4 generated content in university assessments. Cornell University. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305.
  34. Raghavan, S., & Sinha, A. (2023). Prompt engineering as an important emerging skill for medical professionals. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 25(1), e50638. https://doi.org/10.2196/50638
  35. Rienties, B., Domingue, J., Duttaroy, S., Herodotou, C., Tessarolo, F., & Whitelock, D. (2024). I would love this to be like an assistant, not the teacher: A voice of the customer perspective of what distance learning students want from an artificial intelligence digital assistant. arXiv preprint, arXiv:2403.15396.
  36. Rožman, M., Tominc, P., & Vrečko, I. (2023, August 29). Building skills for the future of work: Students’ perspectives on emerging jobs in the Data and AI Cluster through artificial intelligence in education. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.54517/esp.v8i2.1670
  37. Song, C., & Song, Y. (2023, December 15). Enhancing academic writing skills and motivation: assessing the efficacy of ChatGPT in AI-assisted language learning for EFL students. Frontiers Media, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1260843
  38. Souter, J. (2023). Worked example of AI augmented reflexive thematic analysis: Long COVID in Australia. The Age.
  39. Srivastava, P., & Sinha, P. (2016). Appreciative inquiry: An organizational learning tool. IUP Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15(2), 7-19.
  40. Steiss, J., Tate, T., Graham, S., Cruz, J., Hébert, M., Wang, J., Moon, Y., Tseng, W., Warschauer, M., & Olson, C. B. (2024). Comparing the quality of human and ChatGPT feedback of students' writing. Learning and Instruction, 91, 101894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894
  41. Storey, V. A. (2023). AI technology and academic writing.International Journal of Adult Education and Technology, 14(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijaet.325795
  42. Tauginienė, L., Gaižauskaitė, I., & Daukilas, S. (2018). ENAI Recommendations on the ethical use of Artificial Intelligence in education. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 14(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-023-00133-4
  43. Thomas, R., Bhosale, U., Shukla, K., & Kapadia, A. (2023, February 16). Impact and perceived value of the revolutionary advent of artificial intelligence in research and publishing among researchers: a survey-based descriptive study. Korean Council of Science Editors, 10(1), 27-34. https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.294
  44. Tseng, W., & Warschauer, M. (2023, May 9). AI-writing tools in education: Iif you can’t beat them, join them. De Gruyter, 3(2), 258-262. https://doi.org/10.1515/jccall-2023-0008
  45. Typeset. (2023). AI for thesis writing — Unveiling 7 best AI tools. SciSpace. https://typeset.io/resources/ai-for-thesis-writing/
  46. Wang, H., Fu, T., Du, Y., et al. (2023). Scientific discovery in the age of artificial intelligence. Nature, 620(47-60). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06221-2
  47. Zastudil, C., Rogalska, M., Kapp, C., Vaughn, J., & MacNeil, S. (2023, January 1). Generative AI in Computing Education: Perspectives of Students and Instructors. Cornell University. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2308.
  48. Zhao, P., Zhang, X., Cheng, M., Yang, J., & Li, X. (2024, February 20). Aa literature review of literature reviews in pattern analysis and machine intelligence. Cornell University. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2402.
  49. Zheng, C., Yuan, K., Guo, B., Hadi Mogavi, R., Peng, Z., Ma, S., & Ma, X. (2024, May). Charting the Future of AI in Project-Based Learning: A Co-Design Exploration with Students. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-19).
  50. Zvirgzdauskaite, L. (2024). Enhancing personalized learning through AI in higher education. Computers & Education, 85(3), 210–223.